You can find the recommendations here.
The proposal here is that the Superintendent will make a mid-cycle report on her goals (the goals from November 3, 2011) with the first evaluation being held next November.
Novick: suggestion that a mid-cycle review be included in the process for this year. Also an amendment that all individual evaluations be part of the discussion at the public evaluation. Also pointing out that the timeline does put evaluation mid-election every other year.
Foley: a mid-cycle review makes sense will be incorporated; avoids the election cycle (they thought of that)
O'Connell: very much in keeping with the discussion of the Ad-hoc committee
passes as amended