Showing posts with label recruitment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label recruitment. Show all posts

Monday, September 30, 2019

Do districts really want teachers and leaders of color

And what happens when they get them?
It was interesting to read this piece in EdWeek this morning, a reflection from a Black male teacher:
I was tired of being looked to as a disciplinarian. I was exhausted by the mandates of no-excuses and the confines of a curriculum and instructional techniques where I had little to no say. I loved my students, but it wasn't enough.
Valuing and supporting teachers after they are hired is often more important than simply hiring them in the first place. Too many districts instead offer little to no support for Black teachers, overutilize them for disciplinary purposes, and do not respect them for both their content knowledge and instructional skills.
...with this piece from the Washington Post discussing implicit bias in school climate reports.
In a Dec. 28 memo to the county school board, Smith said he looked at an elementary school climate survey showing the percentage of employees who said “staff morale is positive in this school.” This was after the Montgomery County Education Association teachers union told him the district should do more about schools with low morale.
“I became concerned because of the racial makeup of the principals of both lists,” Smith said. “I determined that 15 of the 18 principals with the most positive ratings were White/Caucasian and 11 of the 15 principals with the lowest rating were Black/African American or Hispanic.”
He told the board that “cultural proficiency and implicit bias” should be considered in creating future surveys. “To use an instrument that results in the over-identification of any race, gender, age or culture is unacceptable,” he said.
Recruiting isn't even half of the issue. Retaining and valuing teachers of color is a long-term, sustained need. 

Monday, May 27, 2019

Towards a more diverse teaching force

They're working on it in Framingham, and there's a two part series in the Metrowest Daily News this weekend: Part I and Part II

Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Board of Ed for December: Springfield Empowerment Zone

Wulfson: established in 2014 "innovative approach to underperforming schools"
middle schools and one high school
"garnering a lot of interest from educators"

Johnston: receivers coming before you ever month
Springfield "an in-district receivership model"
Board hasn't heard from Springfield in two years; in third year of implementation

Gabrieli, chair of empowerment zone along with co-chairs
"one crisp goal...reach a 50/50 set of goal"

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Educational support; printing and postage; out of state travel

Colorio: credit recovery lab:got moved to this account?
Allen: for clarity
works at North High
Biancheria: compares to North High's line item
change in salary from last year to this: decrease in salary
Allen: not the same person
Boone: moved the location of this person's pay to educational support
Allen: there was a retirement
move happened last year; change was noted in quarterly reports
Printing and postage approved
In-state travel approved
Out-of-state travel
Biancheria: zero to $5,000
grants no longer covering the expense
Boone: was not zero; it was reflected in a grant budget
being reflected in an operations budget
Biancheria: tax-based dollars of $5000
Luster: "happy to have the opportunity to discuss the Worcester Public Schools teacher recruitment program"
plan to attend a job fair in Chicago: to benefit from loss of teaching positions there
3 to 4 out of state fairs for national recruitment
Biancheria: Chicago an excellent location to begin the process
"don't have an issue with recruitment"
"also reads staff development" ('though that line item is set at zero)
Luster: "can barely manage our recruitment efforts with $5000"
Allen: staff development and personnel office both are in here, but none of the money is for staff development (which it says in line B)
Colorio: how many teachers are recruited this way?
Petty suggests "success rate": getting a report
O'Connell: recruitment trips out of grant funds?
Allen: Title IIA funds used for recruitment
O'Connell: still have Title IIA funds available? still exists but in a reduced form
Allen: 8% reduction, as across the board


Thursday, June 17, 2010

Misc Education OM

Fees and licenses going up by 80%, Biancheria notes. NOVA Net fees at North and Creamer are the difference (previously this was funded by donation).
asks if we can reduce the employee recruitment/advertising account, as we've laid people off: motion to cut by $5000
Luster: there are positions that we need to replace: we could do it internally, but it might cut down on who we get. Advertising is expensive.
suggests cutting it by $5000
Foley concerned we'd be shortchanging ourselves if we didn't include the full spectrum
Biancheria asks if we can cut the food account (which is $8000; cut to $6000)
Monfredo asks if we can cut moving expenses by $5000
Allen says moving several classrooms (that can't be done in house); recommend maintain.
O'Connell will support cut to advertising.
Can we fund food out of grants?
account is cut by $5000 from advertising; motion to cut food fails
passes as done