Showing posts with label OML. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OML. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

Public bodies and public meetings and public speech

A few true if possibly unpopular points which I am putting here because I have no interest in arguing in threads1 of comments:

Public bodies meet to conduct public business. There are things that are under the purview of specific public bodies, and they are required to meet in posted meetings of a quorum of that body to make decisions in public (with ten exceptions).

By Massachusetts state law, those public meetings are not required to have public comment, which is always, under MGL Ch. 30A, sec. 20 (g), at the discretion of the chair 2

Monday, June 16, 2025

On dailyness in a time lacking precedent

 

Boston Fire Department post-fire
I was working in the office in Boston the last week of May when a noticeable number of fire engines came screaming by. A look at social media revealed that a building two blocks over was actively on fire. It was the kind of fire that has people from all directions taking photos--lots of smoke in a heavily built-up area--and so it got plenty of attention. 
It wasn't, though, until I went to get lunch, and being just as nosy as you are, walked up the blocks to see what was now extinguished, taking the above photo, that I realized that I had at no point worried about where I was or my own safety. Despite being in an old port city, now build out of bricks for a reason, we have people for this: people who show up every day, having been extensively trained and equipped, exactly so I don't have to think about what I'm to do when a building two blocks over is on fire. 

I have been thinking a lot lately about this sort of showing up we take for granted, even as so much nationally is falling apart. So much of what have been so often sneeringly dismissed as federal bureaucrats are people--surprise!--on whose work we rely. This point was so effectively made by those suing to keep the federal Department of Education that they got an injunction, but of course it is just as true in every federal department, from the IRS (yes, indeed) to National Parks to USAID and on and on.

But as above, so below: the functioning of so many things at the state level and at the local level depends on the daily work of people whose names and titles never make articles, whose functions never get discussed unless and until some clueless git eliminates them. 

Do you think about what's in your water when you turn on the tap? 
Or what happens after you take out the trash to the curb? 
Or if the bridge you drive over on your way to work is going to fall down?

Aren't you glad that somebody does?

Thursday, September 7, 2023

bits more from Brockton today

 ...as they had a school committee meeting last night, which had an active public comment section period, and someone noted that maybe the meeting last week wasn't as public as necessary. The district communications person has said that overspending was in transportation, special education, and payroll. 
The district--I guess the school committee?--has also placed the top two financial people on administrative leave as of Friday. The mayor said this: 

As the mayor and as a parent of children in city schools, Sullivan said he was shocked to learn about the FY2023 school deficit. He said he was notified of the shortfall on Aug. 8 by Petronio and Correia. The next day, Sullivan said he met with the both Petronio and Correia, the city’s chief financial officer, and the schools superintendent, Mike Thomas, who confirmed the deficit.

What I haven't yet seen is any reporting on how the deficit was possible, as the schools operate as a city department, with all spending going through the city treasurer, and departments can't overspend what they have had allocated to them (a bottom line in the city budget). 
Hoping someone gets to that part soon. 

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

New posting of executive sessions

If you are a School Committee or public meeting observer, you will note a new specificity in our posting of our executive sessions. Here is next week's:

This is entirely thanks to Dr. Friel, who went to the Open Meeting Law training here in Worcester last month, asked lots of questions, and brought back the changes needed to keep us in line with the law. 
Good news for public transparency!