Board of Ed on level 5 Schools

which I came back in halfway through, alas, so I'm updating here from my Twitter feed

The reports on @MASchoolsK12 Level 5 schools is here: https://t.co/qBsHwqzzeM #MAEdu

— Tracy Novick (@TracyNovick) October 25, 2016

McKenna asks if the outside evaluators knew there were problems last year on Level 5 receivers, why did the Board not know? #MAEdu

— Tracy Novick (@TracyNovick) October 25, 2016

Craven: worry that our most successes are in district takeover (rather than school by school) #MAedu

— Tracy Novick (@TracyNovick) October 25, 2016

Craven: giving any third-party purveyor a real challenge in receivership.
(this is reflecting on Blueprint)

— Tracy Novick (@TracyNovick) October 25, 2016

a couple of comments about the "massive size" of @BostonSchools #MAEdu

— Tracy Novick (@TracyNovick) October 25, 2016

Sagan asking if there's a @BostonSchools that would sit at the table with Blueprint and talk about the Level 5 schools.

— Tracy Novick (@TracyNovick) October 25, 2016

(Probably paging @SuptChang, here on @BostonSchools...hate when they talk about districts with no one here.) #MAEdu

— Tracy Novick (@TracyNovick) October 25, 2016

McKenna: saw nothing in the report about the Holland about suspension rates
"We learned about it in the newspaper." #MAEdu

— Tracy Novick (@TracyNovick) October 25, 2016

"almost 40% turnover"
"major issue for the two schools that we're the board for"#MAEdu

— Tracy Novick (@TracyNovick) October 25, 2016

Agree with Craven that if there's another way, a hybrid system with @BostonSchools
would like to know more on the suspension rate. #MAEdu

— Tracy Novick (@TracyNovick) October 25, 2016

Chester "If the Chicago Cubs can make the World Series, surely we can fix this problem!"#MAEdu

— Tracy Novick (@TracyNovick) October 25, 2016