They're reviewing a series of recently updated policies, largely required by changes in regulation or law.
They're doing sections C (administration), D (financial), and E (student supports) of the district policy review. Oddly, there appears to be a significant drop in legal references (not sure why)...For anyone out there still wondering what happened with Worcester and warrants, there's an implicit answer in section DGA, which mentions the superintendent, the city manager, the city auditor, the city treasurer...and not the school committee; likewise, section DJA specifically references no other authority being necessary. All of the references are to the municipal charter.
In response to the question about ESSA, there's a section of the student handbook (?), which hasn't been substantially redrafted under the new law. As there have been a number of presentations on what ESSA means for school districts, I'm not sure why this is the answer.
In response to the questions about safety and a principals' meeting, there's ALICE:
Changes in school safety are in response to the new ALICE Training and related protocols:
1. Over 3,500 employees will take e-learning training on ALICE.
2. In addition to lockdown and medical drills there will also be ALICE drills.
3. Teachers will have their phones in their possession and on vibrate when school is in session to receive system safety notifications when necessary.
4. School Resource Officers (SRO) and school administrators will receive training on school law.
5. The WPS continues to work to enhance security systems in the schools.It's disturbing to see "e-learning" with ALICE, as one thing that is emphasized over and over on emergency training is muscle memory. Unless you're training someone on typing, you're not getting muscle memory on a computer.
No comments:
Post a Comment