Showing posts with label civics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label civics. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 23, 2026

June 2026 Board of Ed: Civics

 Super weird to me that the update includes this "look this curriculum is everywhere"

civics law passed in 2018

student-led civics projects

Oddly, this presentation is from iCivics, not from DESE staff or school district people, or...this is kind of weird; 

"goal of schooling is produced informed engaged citizens"
"health of our constitutional democracy requires sustained commitment"
now speaking about the We Declare! challenge

Here's the Boston Green Academy winning video


June 2026 Board of Ed: opening comments

 As I noted earlier this week, this agenda has the end-of-year group of reports today: one on civics, because 250th anniversary of the Declaration; the end of year Student Advisory Report; probably some talk about the statewide graduation report, which had its own meeting last night; the Mitchell Chester award; plus they have regulations to update.

There's a pre-meeting rally happening in the courtyard outside about immigration, 'though there has not been a lot directed to the Board on that (and the Governor issued guidance on this topic last month)

The livestreaming video is here.

from my walk to the meeting


Monday, June 22, 2026

It's a two meeting week for the Board of Ed

 As a reminder: the Board has a special meeting tonight (Monday) at 5 PM virtually, specifically on the recently released graduation report. 

They have their regular June meeting tomorrow at 9 AM (yes, both agendas are a single page) in Everett. That agenda includes the end of the school year things--the Mitchell Chester award, the end of year report from the student rep from the State Student Advisory Council--along with some end of year informational reports (off agenda) including both the chronically underperforming schools report, and the non-operating school districts report (my personal favorite Massachusetts education trivia question!). 

There is also a report on civics education (you might remember this was a request of the chair at the last meeting) and a report on the operating conditions of Pioneer Valley Chinese Immersion Charter School, who the Commissioner is recommending being released from their current conditions but:

 While I recommend that the Board remove the current conditions, concerns remain about the board’s governance practices, such as an Open Meeting Law violation and other deficiencies in complying with the Open Meeting Law; inconsistent implementation of the board’s review and approval processes; and, based on review of board and committee meeting minutes and observations of board meetings, indications that board trainings have not led to improved governance practices or a clearer understanding of the role and responsibilities of the governing body. 

This is pretty interesting, as (as you would see if you searched their history on this blog), PVCICS has had what I'd call a storied history when it comes to their relationship with the state that charters them. Among other interchanges, they're the only example I remember of Paul Sagan, when he was chair, being utterly exasperated by something publicly, when they applied over the head of the Commissioner for an expansion that had been refused by the Commissioner. I would say that they have a culture of going their own way, so to speak. Speaking so directly to their governance is interesting. 

There are also two rounds of regulations up for vote: special education (which is aligning regulations with state and federal law) and interpretation and translation. I did a brief thread on my own comment on the proposed regs yesterday on Bluesky, but I do recommend reading the public comment summary overall. 

I won't be on for tonight's meeting, but I'll be posting tomorrow from Everett. 

Do they read all the comments? Yes! There's mine.


Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Massachusetts state standards in action


While it is school vacation week here in Massachusetts, I came across two things over the weekend that were the Massachusetts state education standards in action.

First, this post from the Governor's thread on the new AI-bot that the state is using:


Bluesky post from Governor Healey's account says "Government should embrace new technology --safely and securely--to make life easier for our families and businesses"

The word "should" is doing a lot of work there. That would be grounds for a solid discussion under one of the four strands of our state technology and computer science standards, Computing and Society, which includes both "ethics and laws" and "interpersonal and societal impact." In high school, this includes the following standard [9-12.CAS.c #5]:
Analyze the beneficial and harmful effects of computing innovations (e.g., social networking, delivery of news and other public media, intercultural communication). 

It would behoove the Governor and her administration to do so before continuing to thrust this unwanted change upon us.


In the second case, high school and middle school students in Massachusetts have been organizing walkouts to protest against ICE. This analysis, research, organization, and action is directly reflective of the state's required civics project in both middle and high school, for which you can find the reference guide below. 

Most notably, the overall requirement is:

 Students complete the real work of engaged, informed participants in a democracy by identifying issues and advocating for change in their communities.

And:

 They move beyond the walls of the classroom and exercise their voice.

The thing about education: it isn't, in the end, supposed to be theoretical. Either we mean it, or we don't.

Friday, January 30, 2026

Was there AI coverage this week?

 There is ALWAYS AI coverage!

  • For those considering AI in education, please be sure you've read this NPR piece speaking with Chanea Bond about her making her high school English classroom analog. I'm familiar with Mrs. Bond from social media (here she is on Bluesky), and I've always appreciated how she approaches her teaching, as well as the relationship she clearly has with her students. 
    And in this case, it's one of her students I'm going to quote: 
    "Take a second and think about it. Would you rather really grow from an experience of actually doing some work and critically thinking about the things you're writing or talking about, or just taking nothing away from it and just use a robot?"
  • Those quoted in the above piece as being pro-AI (and really in just about every article I have read in which educators are arguing that it must be included in schools!) sound exactly like this video from Mike Daniels "It's the future" where the answer to "what does it do?" is...kind of the point.


  • This week, Dartmouth discovered that the pro-AI op-ed submitted by a student for their college paper was something the student had been paid by their administration to write, and the administration reviewed the piece prior to its submission. 
    You're not convincing us here, people. 

  • I am currently working my way through the essay "How AI Destroys Institutions" by Woodrow Hartzog  and Jessica Silbey at BU School of Law. The abstract reads as follows: 
    Civic institutions—the rule of law, universities, and a free press—are the backbone of democratic life. They are the mechanisms through which complex societies encourage cooperation and stability, while also adapting to changing circumstances. The real superpower of institutions is their ability to evolve and adapt within a hierarchy of authority and a framework for roles and rules while maintaining legitimacy in the knowledge produced and the actions taken. Purpose-driven institutions built around transparency, cooperation, and accountability empower individuals to take intellectual risks and challenge the status quo. This happens through the machinations of interpersonal relationships within those institutions, which broaden perspectives and strengthen shared commitment to civic goals. 
    Unfortunately, the affordances of AI systems extinguish these institutional features at every turn. In this essay, we make one simple point: AI systems are built to function in ways that degrade and are likely to destroy our crucial civic institutions. The affordances of AI systems have the effect of eroding expertise, short-circuiting decision-making, and isolating people from each other. These systems are anathema to the kind of evolution, transparency, cooperation, and accountability that give vital institutions their purpose and sustainability. In short, current AI systems are a death sentence for civic institutions, and we should treat them as such.
    As education is foundational to these civic systems everywhere, but particularly in a democracy, we should take this quite seriously before inviting AI in.

  • And the good people at McSweeney's this week brought us this gem: 

    You can find that here. 

Tuesday, May 21, 2024

May Board of Ed: Educational Vision

 Johnston: what outcomes are envisioned as a result?

"Our vision is that as a result of their public education in Massachusetts, students will attain academic knowledge and skills, understand and value self and others, and engage with the world"

Wednesday, April 3, 2024

March 21 Worcester School Committee meeting

 It's budget season, which means I am all over the state, so I'll do catch up on these as I can; I wasn't at this one and I can't make the next two, either, so they'll be coming later. Do note that the Committee meets this Thursday; the report of the Superintendent is on special education. 

The March 21 agenda is here; the video of the meeting is here. The report of the superintendent on future ready pathways is here.

Note that prior to the public session, there was an executive session on two worker compensation issues and negotiations with the Mass Nurses Association.

The consent agenda was passed. 

The Burncoat High School spirit team was recognized.

Tuesday, October 24, 2023

October Board of Ed: civics

Erin Hashimoto-Martell, Associate Commissioner of Instructional Support,
Katherine Tarca, Director of Literacy and Humanities
Reuben Henriques, History and Social Science Content Support Lead
Dave Buchanan,  Massachusetts Civic Learning Coalition

October Board of Ed: opening comments

 The Board of Ed meets today at 9 am. The agenda is here. The livestream will be here.

I don't like their new room arrangement. 

Wednesday, August 9, 2023

Quick note on the budget signing

Earlier today, Governor Healey signed the FY24 state budget, which means, at long last, we have a state budget (more than a month into the new fiscal year). 

She did exercise her veto power on a few accounts that involve K-12 education, as follows: 

  • Civics Education Trust fund cut by by $1M to $1.5M 
  • $300K in earmarks in EL & Literacy programs (funded at $5,366,731)
  • $100K from AP math & science (thus funded at $3,292,809)
  • $5,601,240 from circuit breaker, which is the FY23 carryover that was in the language (thus making it $ 498,972,361)
On that last, the Governor cites the $75M in the FY23 supplemental budget, but that last is extraordinary relief. Regardless, the line is fully funded.  
All of the above are found here. 
There are not, as yet, new Ch. 70 spreadsheets, but the cherry sheets are updated. 


Tuesday, September 29, 2020

Board of Ed: September opening remarks

 The agenda is online here

we're coming in late with someone complaining about Newton High not being opening full time and a parent from Andover complaining about schools not being open full time and in person
suspend bus guidance (or suspend requirement bussing requirement), six feet requirement for lunch, and desks facing front
claims it will not increase contagion
"refer to the neighboring states, Rhode Island and New Hampshire"

Pat McQuillan, Boston College professor, Lynch School 
speaking on behalf of other professors of history and social studies
"hoping to give you an easy thing here"

suggests using civics project as a replacement for the MCAS exam
"there are notable funding gaps across the state"
Sends most needy students to the most underfunded schools, least able to meet their needs
"takes what you've already done and starts to move forward with it"
help multilingual learners
"has real world relevance and is an opportunity to empower learners"
"I think you've got this thing knocked if you take a look at yourself"

Chair Craven: welcome to the new year
understand the angst as a parent of four children: a preschooler going in person, a son with special ed needs going four days a week (the other day "a disaster"), and two going remote
"talked to a lot of you on what we can actually do"
"each community in its own data and it's also unique in its ability to bargain with its teachers"
one thing we agree "is that the achievement gap is not going to be improved by this crisis"
"I think that the work of this year"
"can't let the work" that was being done slip
"we have a big year ahead, and again, it's going to be important that we keep going"

Commissioner with housekeeping items
STEM grants
early literacy grant
people have asked about the 21st century grant dollars: DESE applying for a waiver around how they can be used: could be used for pods
ESSER: equitable services issue from DeVos; challenged in court and won; DoE will not appeal; will have guidance going forward
MCAS: Fed has signaled not allowing a waiver for any testing, do anticipate administering
likely will be pushing back date of make-up test usually in fall to January
Hills: not difficult to predict a torrent of advocacy for cancellation in the spring
"last spring was different; we had a pandemic out of the blue"
"I think it would be horrible, terrible policy if were not going to have MCAS whatever the situation is"
"one way or another, I'd like to think that DESE will develop contingency plans" to hold the MCAS whatever the situation
"I don't know how we do our jobs" if we don't give the MCAS
would not announce any hold harmless in advance
Keep Board appraised of planning as it goes

Secretary praises DESE and Commissioner for "continuing to drive" 
"not losing sight of longer term issues"
Thank educators for doing work that is being done
doing while also juggling personal challenges that we are all balancing as a result of the pandemic
"I also want to thank those superintendents and school committees who have responded to the data in their local communities to work as hard as they can to maximize in-person learning."
and goes on about how the state data says this is many places, etc etc
looooong thanks to Governor
argues that the "resources are there"
time to "step up and get smarter about the work we are doing"
"make sure we're doing everything we can for our children"
essential that we not give up on our students

and I need to get off to talk to college students now

Peyser also notes that Moriarty has been reappointed to a second term

The Board also nominated and elected James Morton as vice chair of the Board





Thursday, July 16, 2020

Worcester Voter Registration Initiative presentation

Students presenting on "increasing voter turnout in the city through community engagement, workshops, and civics lessons"
only one out of six registered voters vote
encouraged and excited to vote
civics bill and education and projects and experience in civics
all student run: college and high schools
targeting voter education: getting information to our youth
educational lessons for different age groups: elementary, middle, high
"my own education growing up in Worcester, I wasn't able to have the education I would like it to be"
really connect with our peers
talking about the voting process, how to participate in the community, local state and federal reps
2018 bill only provides a short
especially on the local level
test run with Nativity School in a week
building through Zoom; interactive
talking to different neighborhoods in Worcester
"has to start at our schools"
"especially with the diversity in our city"
"can't have [lack of voting] happening"
have an internship program: making videos, making content
suggestion of what you guys would want and bring it out to students
work with specific history teachers
learning about community and our city
college students working to teacher in different classrooms
using their platform to get information out

Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Student Advisory Council end of year report

Matthew Tibbitts, student rep
60 MA public high schools; every county save Dukes and Nantucket
college and career readiness; how to direct students to resources that already exist
61% of students haven't heard of DESE
those that had and went to website found it difficult to navigate
the few who could find their resources found them useful
Legislative advisory: lobbying on the EMPOWER and SOA
worked on civics education framework
civics engagement
Equity in race and economics: 92% of teachers are white/ lopsided with demographics of students
ensuring we have teachers that can teach students that look like them
supporting teachers of color
Global outreach: MA languages
shifting narrative in language acquisition
advocated for world language and ELL to be single program

Monday, October 7, 2019

Joint Committee on Education hearing: charter schools, genocide and other matters

The agenda is here.
The room is packed.
Lewis: Peisch is finishing up a meeting on transportation
will allow elected officials to testify out of turn, then will take testimony in order on the docket

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

May Board of Ed from the Malden Public Library: history, social studies, and civics update

back up is here
Peske: one year since approval of new standards
Michelle Ryan (herself a former Randolph history and social studies teacher):

Monday, May 20, 2019

The Board of Ed meets tomorrow

The Board of Ed meets at the Malden Public Library (?) tomorrow at 10:30 (different time and location).
After the usual array of comments by the Chair, Secretary, Commissioner, and the public, the agenda includes an update on the teacher diversification project (one of the Commissioner's goals for this year); a report on what the Department has been doing on the updated standards for history, social studies, and civics; an update on the state budget (as Senate Ways and Means has released their budget); and proposed dates for next year's meetings.

It looks to me like a shorter agenda, but I am planning on liveblogging.

Tuesday, May 14, 2019

Students learn what they live about civics

...and that means that how schools operate and how schools treat them as the next generation of leaders matters:
In the midst of debates over what students should learn in civics and how to deliver those lessons, civics education advocates risk missing the larger context: Compulsory K-12 schooling itself makes up the most intensive interaction the average American will have with a civic institution—far outpacing the time spent filling in a ballot, sitting in a jury box, or waiting in line at the DMV...
All but absent from the growing civics education conversation is the recognition that everyday interactions in schools also inform students' civic development, and that often those interactions tell a totally different story about individuals' rights from the government textbooks used in class.

Excellent piece--and crucial point!--in EdWeek.

And Worcester, please note the extensive section on the Boston Student Advisory Council.

Friday, May 10, 2019

Senate FY20 budget amendments

Check out Roger Hatch's analysis on the Senate budget for MASS.

Heaven bless them, the Senate sorts by topic!
As always, these are only the K-12 amendments with statewide impacts; if you're looking for an earmark, you're on your own.
to review the way that regional school districts are funded and to recommend a framework that better accounts for differences between the towns that make up these districts and how the funding is distributed
  • Amendment 154 would authorize the use of Water Pollution Abatement funds for lead abatement in public schools.
  • Amendment 155 would create "Finish Line grants" for any year after the first of public university or college. 
  • Amendment 156 would create an unfunded mandate task force. 
  • Amendment 157 would bump the allocation specifically for Gateway Cities in the English learner grant line to $1M (from $250K).
  • Amendment 158 would allocate (a new) $200,000 for the Partnership to Advance Collaboration and Efficiency among the state universities and community colleges.
  • Amendment 159 would add $300,000 for Bottom Line, which works with juniors and seniors to get them into and through college.
  • Amendment 161 would bump the early college allocation from $1.6M to $4M. 
  • Amendment 167 would add $500K through the JFK Library for civics (as was done in the House budget).
  • Amendment 169 would boost the cap on Mass School Building Authority spending to $750M (something for which MSBA has been asking). 
  • Amendment 177 would add the Safe and Supportive Schools grant for $700K.
  • Amendment 178 would create a LIFT fund to "to finance the development and implementation of the recommendations of the foundation budget review" which...I don't know what that means.
  • Amendment 179 would add (back) in military mitigation.
  • Amendment 180 bumps regional transporation reimbursement to to $92M. 
  • Amendment 184 would boost the Mass Mentoring line to $1M.
  • Amendment 193 is (again?) an unfunded mandate task force.
  • Amendment 194 would have DESE do a special education services delivery study.
  • Amendment 195 would add replacing lead pipes to the definition of a capital funding project. 
  • Amendment 202 would add $1.5M to the civics projects trust fund.
  • Amendment 205 would bring METCO up to the $23.6M that the House settled on.
  • Amendment 206 would create a $250K financial literacy grant program.
  • Amendment 217 would add $600K to the Reading Recovery line.
  • Amendment 219 would bump the after and out of school line by about $500K.
  • Amendment 225 would increase the recovery high school line to $3.1M (as it was last year).
  • Amendment 227 would increase the Bay State Reading Institute line by about $400K.
  • Amendment 228 would create a $20.3M Lead in Drinking Water trust fund
  • Amendment 239 would bump the non-resident vocation transportation line (currently $250K) and bump it to $3.4M (which I would guess is full funding).
  • Amendment 245 would increase the amount of the sales tax going to the Mass School Building Authority from 1% to 2%.
  • Amendment 246 would allocate $100K for National History Day.
  • Amendment 247 would allocate $100K for a STEM service learning grant.
  • Amendments 248 and 250 together would add back in the early college line in the foundation budget that the Governor had in his budget (the House did not, nor does the Senate).
  • Amendment 249 would fund MCIEA, the alternative assessment consortium, at $550K (it was funded at $400K in FY19).
  • Amendment 258 would reconsolidate the grants as the Governor did, and includes the use of this funding for innovation zones.
  • Amendment 259 would expand the definition of "rural" for the use of the rural school line of $1.5M, increasing it to 35 students per square mile from 21. This does not include an increase in the funding of the line.
  • Amendment 266 is the $700K for the Accuplacer.
  • Amendment 267 adds a line for $1M for Reach Out and Read.
  • Amendment 268 adds back in the earmark of $250K for Project Bread's Chefs in Schools project.
  • Amendment 277 would increase the rural aid line from $1.5M to $3M.
  • Amendment 278 would add $100K for the Berkshire County Education Task Force.
  • Amendment 280 changes "proposed new text" (Where?) from 2015 to 2014 around the Mass School Building Authority.
  • Amendment 281 increases the allocation for charter reimbursement to $113M (the House number), implements the 100/60/40 reimbursement change, creates that Ch. 70 "floor" that is in the Governor's funding bill and the House budget, increases the facilities allocation, but it does NOT appear to change which districts get funding; it covers all increases, not just the highest enrollment in five years. (For those of you who had been seeking a way to handle the House having language and the Senate not, perhaps this would work?)
  • Amendment 282 would increase the amount in the carter reimbursement line to $125M.
  • Amendment 284 would create a $10M pothole account for districts that would see a net loss of all aid between FY19 and FY20.
  • Amendment 294 adds language (not funding) in the adult education line (allocates towards English learning).
  • Amendment 301 would amend the law to require that the fiscal impact on the sending district be considered in the creation of any new charter school and further bar the creation of any new charter schools in any year in which reimbursement is not fully funded.
  • Amendment 303 appears to fully fund all of the current transporation reimbursements through the creation of a minimum corporate tax (sorry, municipals, you're not in this one)
  • Amendment 306 boosts school to career connecting activities to $5.4M; the Governor proposed at $5M; the House has it at $4.5M and Senate Ways and Means proposed $4.5M.
  • Amendment 308 would allow any district currently in receivership to have up to 80% reimbursment of buildings through MSBA (coming in from Holyoke).
  • Amendment 319 funds the charter reimbursement at 100/60/40 without new allocation, increases the facilities allocation, but does not otherwise change the language (also clearly an attempt to ensure there is language to counter the House)
  • Amendment 320 would provide at $10.5M pothole for those impacted by the low income count shift.
  • Amendment 321 would require Breakfast after the Bell in any school with an eligbility count of 60% of students or more.
  • Amendment 322 boosts the charter reimbursement line to $188M, increases the facility amount, but KEEPS the 100/25s for reimbursement years. It's also doing something to the tax code...let me find that part out. 
That's what I have! Call your Senators! 

Monday, April 22, 2019

House consolidated amendment A doesn't have anything needed in it

There's a boatload of earmarks, but consolidated amendment A on education and local aid doesn't have anything really needed in it.

  • 7009-6600 which is early college programs, goes from $1.75M to $2M (still less than the Governor, who budgeted it at $3M).
  • 7010-0005 (the DESE line) has updated language, allowing those who work for school districts to be paid for work they do for DESE
  • 7010-1192 is stuffed with a boatload of earmarks
  • 7010-1193 includes the $500K for civics education and $500K specifically for civics education from the JFK Library.
  • 7061-0016 (the low income grants) adds the language around requiring approval of the superintendent for those applying for those grants
  • 7061-0035 puts in $525K for the Hanscom towns (but there isn't more general military mitigation in the House budget).
  • 7061-9406 must be a tweak in language, because it still allocates $700K to Accuplacer (bringing to mind the military spending that the military no longer wants; ASK HIGHER ED!).
  • 7061-9814 adds that it may be used during the summer months
I've updated the spreadsheet; let me know if you see something I've missed.

Saturday, April 13, 2019

House Ways and Means FY20:

Bringing to mind this classic from Peggy Lee...

On Wednesday, the House Ways and Means Committee released their FY20 budget. The cherry sheets, specifying the amount of aid by municipality and district, have not yet been updated; however, DESE did us the enormous favor (due I think to pleas from the school business offices) of sharing the Chapter 70 spreadsheets for House Ways and Means (they aren't online; that's my dropbox). I've updated the spreadsheet that I've been using to track the K-12 accounts for FY20 here. I also found the write-up that Roger Hatch did for MASS useful. Amendments were due Friday--yes, very much not a lot of deliberation time there--and can be found here; I'll get to a post on those in the next week, as deliberation won't start until Monday, April 22.

We'll get to the accounts in order eventually, but I want to start with the ones that worry me most first.