Showing posts with label achievement gap. Show all posts
Showing posts with label achievement gap. Show all posts

Monday, September 28, 2026

Bonus Board of Ed for September

 The agenda (which doesn't tell us much) is here. 
The livestream is here.


Martinez: setting new benchmarks for proficiency, lower to zero doesn't meet (I think)
he is just saying this aloud; it isn't shown or written out as to what he's saying...this is really hard to follow

Tuesday, September 21, 2021

September Board of Ed: MCAS

 Rob Curtin:
districts had several more weeks to give test
shortened grade 3-8 assessment and took one session instead of two
Grade 10 the same
remote administration option 
call out for districts and assessment staff for their flexibility in this 
Board has modified competency determination of classes of '20-'23
over a million assessments, 85% in person, 99% received a valid result
1% did not; some small number of classrooms being reviewed and grade 8 remote science was not able to be scored due to a contractor error
participation remained strong across; all at 90% or higher (save 89% at math grade 10); younger grades 97% in gr.3-5 in both subjects
Typically in 97% in grade 8 and under; 95% grade 10, so a dip, but still strong
Someone asked if there were higher pockets of non participation
Moriarty: 89% in math grade 10: harbinger of dropping out?Curtin: not as yet, provide ample opportunity for students to take the test to meet the competency determination
stacked bars of achievement; vertically within each grade an achievement level; horizontally comparing across grades
Blue bar of achievement in 2019: orange above the blue line in grades 3-8 is the drop in students meeting or exceeding expectations compared to 2019
2021 grade 10 OUTPERFORMED 2019 in ELA (so no orange over the bar!)
West asks if test was shorter, confirms it was not in grade 10 
Curtin: do have "tale of two subjects" as we look at math
Decreases in ELA for sure, "to a more significant degree in math"
concern with amount of red "not meeting expectations"
grade 10 did experience a decrease in math as compared to ELA
science drop more consistent with ELA than math
15% drop in meeting or exceeding expectations in grades 3-8
grade 10 7%
West: comfort in comparison?
Curtin: "what gives me comfort is numbers"
speaks of the numbers of tests given and results
and I missed a section here...augh
Curtin: looking at achievement gap
math change in achievement gap: "actually have a little bit of a narrowing"
"all in all, we end up with certainly declining results" but while we might have feared increasing achievement gaps, that isn't what happened (that last is totally paraphrase)

Riley says he sees recovery as a several year project

Morton: what is social emotional impact on students and on schools
"if we could get such data, that would be helpful"
Riley: "I don't think there is such data."
Morton: "then maybe there should be"
Morton: should focus on alternative assessments, "I'd like us to be sure that we're spending the same amount of resources on alternative assessments"

and then an alarm sounded and the floor? building? was ordered to be evacuated via an automated voice

Hills: wanted to make a comment "there's no perfect place on the agenda to make it"
Haven't looked at individual assessments, 
MOU and work that DESE wants to be able to do in Boston
"systemic and systematic and structural problems" in Boston Public Schools
"more skeptical now than I was a year and a half ago"
Don't know how you're going to address deep and wide options "without considering all options including receivership"
"beginning to feel complicit"
"not another day that goes by without another Boston Globe article that...amps my skepticism up a notch"
"I just want to raise this issue publicly, not just privately"
Riley notes it is "not on the agenda today" but hears concerns and notes "there is a process"

Tuesday, September 18, 2018

September Board of Ed: Foundation budget review commission

backup is here

Wulfson: thought it would be useful to give you a quick refresher course on what the foundation budget is
upcoming
Massachusetts one of first states to adopt such a budgetary plan
"one of the key measures of if we are meeting our constitutional obligation" to provide an education for all students
rises to the top of the list as it is a constitutional obligation
FY19: total foundation budget a little under $11B; a little over $11K per student
funded through a combination of state aid and required local contribution
excludes several significant items: transportation, construction, extraordinary sped costs, pensions
those run about $2.5B on top of foundation budget
pretty much untouched from its initial adoption in 1993
2015 commission established to review assumptions in foundation budget
"despite a lot of effort by staff in legislature and the conference committee...with a lot of support from our school finance office here...a major rewrite is quite an endeavor"

important to note "despite news coverage to the contrary, none of those discussions had anything to do with the current fiscal year"
fiscal year '20 budget isn't over: "it's just starting"

many districts choosing to spend over foundation
others held harmless well above the current foundation budget
an increase in the foundation budget for a particular district does not translate into a dollar-for-dollar increase in state aid and "in some, it may not translate to any increase in state aid"

Wulfson notes that "what tools and levels are we thinking about that will translate increased spending to increased student achievement" was discussed at the end of the Commission ('though he fails to note that those who wanted such things tied LOST)

Craven: important for Board to look at four issues and look at how their weighted
"the only one here that could be translated into achievement gap closure" is poverty
that...isn't true at all
"as a veteran of minimum aid"
Peyser: the districts that benefit are the ones that are spending right at that level" of foundation
"even if you're increasing a factor that effects all districts equally" in terms of state aid it leans most to districts that most lack local capacity
Wulfson: fiscal distress is two catagories: Gateways, where enrollment is growing; and rural districts where districts are tiny and shrinking
Craven: would preferred something that's more targeted
"I don't know how it helps achieve our goals over time" with the other issues
because...it isn't about that?
Peyser: how do we ensure those funds are being used to have a larger impact on student outcomes?
potential of thinking about other parts of the state finance system
Sagan: budget as a process that happens "to us"
Craven: generally think that anything that puts money into the system is a good thing, I do think that the Legislature will run out of money on this at some point, "that's a balancing act, as well"
Riley: unintended consequences: if the average municipality spends 20% above foundation, in theory districts can divert money to police and fire and stay above foundation
McKenna: sometimes I wonder if we're in a bubble
"there's highly documented data on how to attact the achievement gap...but that budget doesn't target those things"
high quality early childhood, full day kindergarten, summer learning
"we're not going to change the achievement gap until we target them"
Wulfson: money put into for programs mentioned are being put in for health insurance and special education which have to be paid for
Moriarty asks if the Medicaid reimbursement still goes back to the general fund
IT DOES
Wulfson: you're correct, there's no legal requirement that it go back


Bell: spending plan for this current year (FY19)
review process for administration and finance
implementation for spending this year
working with Commissioner for FY20 ask
no withholding, no vetoes, implementing budget as Legislature passed
have money for implementation for history/civics standards and assessment
FY19 just awaiting final approval for ANF on spending plan
"from a budgeting perspective, we're onto FY20"
federal side: "despite all of the last few years...Congress has pretty much continued to fund federal education programs at a baseline program level"

Monday, May 14, 2018

Board of Ed meets on Accountability

This is what would usually be next Monday's "special meeting," but is early due to Shavuot ending Monday at sundown. 
The livestream is here.
The memo is here. The presentation is as yet not posted. 
Posting as we go once it starts 
starting the meeting with six members...

Riley: know this process has been ongoing for awhile now, long before he was in position
"one more crack at understanding the process and where we're going here"

Thursday, January 25, 2018

Rennie Center: Conditions of Education in the Commonwealth 2018

Today I'm at the Rennie Center's annual Conditions of Education in the Commonwealth, scheduled to start at 8:30. Former Secretary of Education John King is the main speaker. The hashtag is #COE2018.  Posting as we go.

D'Entremont: taking a step back
"you don't need an idea...we've given you plenty"
"empowering and resourcing leaders on the front line...and drive change"
"how do we bring power and resources into the system...so it impacts students"
critical need for fact-based objective analysis, to build common understandings of what's happening in the public schools
pursuing consensus and collaboration

Saturday, May 7, 2016

Fifteen years on...

...and we still have an achievement gap...and that isn't the only gap we have:
"Whenever we talk about neighborhood and school segregation, they really go hand in hand," Owens said. "There's really a feedback loop, and it's often framed as, we can never have integrated schools while we have segregated neighborhoods, but the flip side is true, as well. As long as schools are unequal and linked to neighborhoods, that's going to play a big role in neighborhood segregation."

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

The impact of school suspensions on racial achievement gaps.

The Atlantic covers a study published last month by the Oxford University Press on the impact of school suspensions on the racial achievement gap.
The study—which was authored by Edward Morris, a sociologist at the University of Kentucky, and Brea Perry, a sociologist at Indiana University—concludes that school suspensions account for roughly one-fifth of the white-black achievement gap. “Particularly for African American students in our data, the unequal suspension rate is one of the most important factors hindering academic progress and maintaining the racial gap in achievement,” Morris and Berry write, describing discipline patterns as an example of “hidden inequality embedded within routine educational practices.” During the 2011-12 school year, black children accounted for 16 percent of the U.S. student population but 32 percent of the students suspended and 42 percent of those expelled, according to Education Department data ; nationwide, black students are suspended at roughly three times the rate as their white counterparts.
What's also fascinating (and worrying) is there is evidence that suspension has an impact on the achievement of the student body--even those who haven't been suspended.

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

If you're interested in who is doing what on testing

From Mary Ann Stewart in an assessment subcommittee for the Board of Ed

Also, you might remember that Worcester is doing all paper for the schools that take PARCC this spring, due to the discrepancy in scores of the paper and computer versions from last year (aka: the kids who took it on the computer did noticably poorer). This research from a writing research project on fourth graders is notable: writing on a computer widened the achievement gap.

"The Urgency of Excellence" on the Worcester Superintendent Search

The report that's being issued this morning in connection with this event is here. 
Full house...maybe fifty or more people here...they're setting out more chairs
Jennifer Davis Carey comments that it's nice to see so many "education nerds" this morning
report represents "a significent body of work"
"urgency and import that we feel is at hand with this transition point"
report falls into two parts: Worcester as a community, as a Gateway City
second is what we need as a community going forward
strengths of the district, growth over time, critical needs of the district
"core strategic" planning of the district
calls for development of a strategic plan

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Here we go: Board of Ed considers testing options

updating as we go...Note that they will do opening remarks, then the PARCC results, then the vote. I'm going to stick it all in one post, though.
The room is full, but only just (I've seen it much more so). What is full is the DESE staff section (to overflowing), and they don't all have to be here for the items on the agenda. Just getting a quorum now; Chair Paul Sagan just came in. He announced that they're still missing a few people "and one is stuck on a bridge" so they're going to wait a few minutes.

Friday, November 13, 2015

ESEA compromise bill coming out

EdWeek has the full rundown ('though the language isn't out yet). For those paywalled out, major points:
  • testing grades 3-8 and once in high school, but what it counts for is up to states. Bottom 5% of schools, as well as those not closing achievement gap, need intervention, but how is up to states. Likewise, while 95% participation in testing is still required, what happens if it isn't met is up to states.
  • while there's some block granting on the federal education grants, it doesn't look as major as it could have been (watch that one); something on the innovation bit, something on the wraparound bit as well.
  • no Title I portability (money doesn't move with kids), though there's some sort of a pilot program (watch this one, too)
  • also no changes to Title I calculations, though some changes to Title II calculations (Title II is teachers)
The projection is that this will be in conference next week, with a vote by Thanksgiving. 

Monday, February 2, 2015

John King, now at federal Doe, formerly New York Ed head

King: honor and a privilege to be here today
"always be a New Yorker...honored to work with Sec'ty Duncan"

Rep. Suzanne Bonamici, rep on House Committee on education and the workforce

she's from Oregon, and I came in partway through
Primary responsiblity for education lies with state and local authorities
most resources come from state and local resources
started in state legislature
"I became one of those stay-at-home moms who was never at home"

Wednesday, January 7, 2015

Worcester preschool and kindergarten registration now open!

If you have someone in your house who will be five by December 31, 2015, they can be registered for kindergarten now at the Parent Information Center (508-799-3194) at 768 Main Street. Please bring proof of the child's date of birth, proof of the child's immunization and test for lead, and proof of residency (a utility bill will do it). Kindergarten in Worcester is full day. Visitors to kindergartens are welcome:
  • South Quadrant - Week of February 3, 2014
  • North Quardrant - Week of February 10, 2014
  • Doherty Quadrant - Week of February 10, 2014
  • Burncoat Quadrant - Week of February 27, 2014
(if you don't know what quadrant you're in, the list is here) 
Remember that Worcester has school choice on a space available basis. We run magnet programs (in particular) at Jacob Hiatt and Worcester Arts, and a bilingual (Spanish/English) program at Roosevelt and Chandler Magnet. I'd recommend visiting!

WPS is also now accepting applications for preschool at the Parent Information Center for children who will be four by December 31, 2015. Preschool is half-day and is offered at: 
  • Belmont Street Community School
  • Canterbury Magnet Computer-Based School
  • Chandler Magnet School
  • City View Discovery School
  • Clark Street Developmental Learning School
  • Columbus Park Preparatory Academy
  • Elm Park Community School
  • Francis J. McGrath Elementary School
  • Gates Lane School of International Studies
  • Goddard School of Science & Technology
  • Grafton Street School
  • Jacob Hiatt Magnet School
  • Lincoln Street School
  • Norrback Avenue School
  • Quinsigamond School
  • Roosevelt School
  • South High Community School
  • Vernon Hill School
  • West Tatnuck School
  • Woodland Academy
  • Worcester Arts Magnet School
  • Worcester Technical High School
Generally, visitors to preschool are welcome; just call the school to set it up.


Thursday, July 26, 2012

Accountability subcommittee: charter schools

The agenda is here.
Four items on the agenda, starting with one regarding charter schools.
We only have data on students who attended WPS previously; new information starts here
Perda mentions enrollment of blacks as significantly higher in charters than in WPS. Free and reduced lunch 62.1 % at charters; 70% at WPS.
Significantly different numbers on special ed: 11.3 on all charters, 20.9% at WPS.
O'Connell: knowing this going forward, outreach efforts going forward
"judging by Abby Kelley, and Seven Hills, a more affluent black population that has gravitated towards Abby Kelley, with a more Hispanic population going to Seven Hills"
effort made by these schools to attract particular populations
O'Connell do we have any idea if there has been particular efforts on outreach from charter schools?
Perda: speculation at this point, could very well be correct, could be recruitment going on
"May present some opportunities for the district"
"the grass is always greener on the other side...may feel dissatisfied...maybe I'll give it a try somewhere else"
O'Connell: "academic daycare...impression is that the school focus is on discipline"
suggestion on survey to add facilities; this was a parental concern previously
O'Connell further asks for an outreach effort after the results of the survey are known
Novick: can we break down by recent African immigrants versus African-American students? Yes.
Numbers on Seven Hills come closest to reflecting WPS and thus reflect our struggles
special ed numbers are way out of wack
series of motions here asking for financial impact, asking degree to which Worcester charter schools are meeting the requirements in the Act Relative to the Achievement Gap, asking for WPS to be at the Board of Ed when any of Worcester's charter schools (present or possible)
Biancheria adds that we invite our legislative delegation whenever this comes before the Board of Ed

Saturday, April 21, 2012

Erasing the opportunity gap: NSBA

This one is from someone from the Austin, TX school district and someone from Appleseed
publishing as I go
"The Same Starting Line: Erasing the Opportunity Gap Between Poor and Middle Class Children"
 "What is it that you as board members are offering poor kids versus what's being offered middle class families?"

Saturday, February 11, 2012

Widening educational gap between rich and poor

For some reason, two studies that came out back in the fall have been getting press this week (including substantial coverage in the New York Times). Both were part of a compilation of studies Wither Opportunity? put out by the Russell Sage Foundation and the Spencer Foundation examining widening opportunity gaps in education based on family income over the past several decades.
One of the studies, "Gains and Gaps: Changing Inequality in U.S. College Entry and Completion" (to quote from the abstract):
...find(s) growing gaps between children from high- and low-income families in college entry, persistence, and graduation. Rates of college completion increased by only four percentage points for low-income cohorts born around 1980 relative to cohorts born in the early 1960s, but by 18 percentage points for corresponding cohorts who grew up in high-income families.
From the Times article:
The University of Michigan study, by Susan M. Dynarski and Martha J. Bailey, looked at two generations of students, those born from 1961 to 1964 and those born from 1979 to 1982. By 1989, about one-third of the high-income students in the first generation had finished college; by 2007, more than half of the second generation had done so. By contrast, only 9 percent of the low-income students in the second generation had completed college by 2007, up only slightly from a 5 percent college completion rate by the first generation in 1989.
In the Stanford study, which looked at standardized test scores:
The achievement gap between children from high- and low-income families is roughly 30 to 40 percent larger among children born in 2001 than among those born twenty-five years earlier.
As the Times correctly notes (and illustrates with a chart), this has been happening at the same time that achievement gaps between white children and children of color have been substantially narrowing.
I should perhaps point out that the Times then goes on to blow it by throwing around a lot of conservative economic theory (no,wait! Income doesn't matter! And it's all the fault of the dang War on Poverty, anyway!), which doesn't precisely forward the conversation. Rather than ending on the note they do ("The cupboard is bare."), I'd suggest that we go back to the middle of the article, which hints a start of a solution:
“The pattern of privileged families today is intensive cultivation,” said Dr. Furstenberg, a professor of sociology at the University of Pennsylvania.
Add that appropriate pre-natal and VERY early childcare, and we might start to get somewhere. The cupboard isn't bare, after all.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

The waivers are coming, the waivers are coming!

President Obama will be announcing the first round of NCLB waivers today. According to the Associated Press:
The first 10 states to receive the waivers are Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oklahoma and Tennessee. The only state that applied for the flexibility and did not get it, New Mexico, is working with the administration to get approval, a White House official told the AP.
Now to see what that means on the ground...
I'll update this post as more comes out today.
UPDATE: The Boston Globe has this report, including the key:
...under the waiver that Massachusetts will recieve, the 100 percent proficiency rule will disappear. In its place, the state is setting a requirement that local schools must cut gaps of achievement among students of different races and other backgrounds in half by 2017.

UPDATE 2: For some reason, DESE has not posted the press release they sent out. The first part is the sort of "he said..." you would expect. I'm posting the pertinent details after the jump.