Shanghai knows better

NPR did a good follow-up to the news that Shanghai had topped the world in their first outing on the international PISA tests. As sharper news organizations mentioned when the results were released, the PISA is just the sort of rote memorization test that the Chinese educational system excels at prepping students for. The NPR follow-up caught that Chinese educators know that this puts their country at a great disadvantage, however:

Liu is very frank about those problems — the continuing reliance on rote learning, the lack of analysis or critical thinking — and he says the system is in dire need of reform.
"Why don't Chinese students dare to think? Because we insist on telling them everything. We're not getting our kids to go and find things out for themselves," he says.

A bit on the travel funds

..per the article regarding the use of WPS funds for traveling, for those wondering.
The Focus on Results conference in Boston was funded from professional development funds. There is no specific budget line-item for PD--it's funded from a variety of grant sources, including the much-discussed Commissioner's district funds.
The recruiting trip cited to San Diego was funded through our federal Title I grant. Worcester receives (for FY11) about $11 million in federal funds for our low-income schools.
And, yes, I believe that more will be coming on this.

Twenty things I've learned since I was elected

As this week marks the final one of my first year in office...In no particular order:

1. It's very humbling to try to explain to a class of first graders what a school committee member does.
2. There are murals on the entryway walls at Worcester East Middle School and a double fireplace in what used to be the library.
3. Sometimes a 2-5 vote is a victory.
4. Never underestimate the imporance of knowing and being able to use parliamentary procedure.
5. There are lots of theories and legends, but no one really knows what's up with the smaller gym at Doherty.

"New Normal" or not

If you were intrigued by Robert Reich's list, you'll want to read Bruce Baker's take on it.

How about a little online research, Mr. K?

Sorry: between sick kids and Christmas, I'm a bit behind on my newspaper reading. This is from Sunday's paper. And sorry the budget links don't go straight to the page; the budget doesn't allow for that.
In a rather rich irony, it appears that Nick Kotsopoulos in his Sunday column lauding the city's transparency in putting the checkbook up online, neglected to do much WPS online research for the rest of his column. In saying, for example, this:

Believe me, there is some eye-opening stuff in the travel account alone.
Based on a quick perusal of that account, it does not look as though any of the public school or municipal employees who attend out-of-state conferences, workshops, seminars etc. are staying at Econo Lodges or other discount hotels in their travels.

...he never bothered to check this (page 86):

which shows a zeroed-out Worcester Public Schools out-of-state travel account. (There is out-of-state travel, but it is always required and thus covered by grants; aka: we have to send people as a condition of the grant, and the grant pays for it.)
As for WPS in-state travel (page 107), it was funded by city funds at $81,619 for FY11. There's a couple of things in this that you might not expect. For example, itinerant teachers (teachers who teach in more than one building) are paid 50 (now, as of last week, 51) cents a mile in their travel between or among schools. That's not exactly a jet-set expense, but it's a real one. This also covers in-state conferences (including one I went to; the Mass Association of School Committee conference in Hyannis came out of this account), which means that it covers a lot of mileage (and probably some Pike tolls), but not a lot of hotel rooms.

As both the city budget and the WPS budget are up online, a minute or two to check accounts would have cleared this up, but I suppose that would have made for a less-dramatic column.

Rep. Jason Lewis: adequacy

It seems that Rep. Jason Lewis has read and absorbed the main points of the Boston Foundation's report on education funding in Massachusetts. In a letter to the Winchester Patch, he writes:

It is time that we reform education funding in Massachusetts to ensure that all our public schools can count on funding that is adequate, equitable, and sustainable.

...
In the meantime, I am planning to file a number of bills related to education funding when the new Legislative Session gets underway in January. The first piece of legislation calls for the state to conduct an Adequacy Study to update the Chapter 70 Foundation Budget. This study would determine the true programmatic and financial resources required to provide a quality education for our children. It would also consider opportunities for achieving greater efficiencies and cost savings within and among school districts through such means as consolidation of smaller school districts and online/distance learning capabilities, particularly for high school students. The second bill calls for changes in the Chapter 70 formula to make education funding more equitable across middle income and wealthier communities.

I'll be looking for what he comes up with!

Far too true

Professor Shaun Johnson's piece on the culture of test prep in elementary school is far too true, as I know firsthand:

Throughout January and beyond, social studies, science, and other expendable subjects stop. That's right, they stop, for months at a time. Schools become mobilized as math and reading academies. And no, it's not this idealized culture of inquiry and intellectual curiosity; students are not reading and discussing literature of their choosing or building mathematical models to simulate concepts. Students as young as eight years old read endless short passages about random topics like dolphin echolocation or volcanoes. They answer multiple choice or short essay questions for just about everything. Any and all pieces of paper are evaluated. Cassette tapes play excerpts of larger texts and are followed by an unyielding stream of worksheets and questions.
What you call math is simply a line-up of procedures and algorithms. Packets and worksheets teach the procedures. Packets and worksheets reinforce and assess the procedures. There is no discovery. There is no modeling, simulation, building, or anything that I can define as solidifying conceptual knowledge of math. No chance that a struggling reader is going to find any solace in math; half the subject now requires almost as much reading as reading itself.

Some, in fact, are doing it year round.

Who's getting hit by the recession?

Robert Reich offers this state-by-state list of education cuts.
UPDATE: And be sure and read  Bruce Baker's take.

Compounding the error

You may have caught that the Massachusetts Teachers Association has today proposed that teachers be in part evaluated based on their students' tests scores. (The full brief is here; as you might guess, it's significantly more complicated than that headline.)
On one hand, this isn't so surprising. As part of the Race to the Top application, Massachusetts had to agree to tie teacher evaluation to student test scores in some way. Thus, when the MTA signed on to RTTT, they were signing on to this.

Gloucester Arts keeps its charter

Demonstrating once again that it doesn't really matter how a charter runs afoul of the law in Massachusetts, Gloucester Arts is off probation and keeping its charter (with two votes dissenting; anyone know who they were?).

If you heard the live WBUR broadcast, the Commissioner's list of what requirements were met was just sad: it has a permanent building, kids 'appear to be learning,' there's an organized dismissal and arrival time...is this really the superior standard that the Board wants education to be striving for?

Federal ed spending to continue at current levels through March

The Senate has reportedly agreed to a deal that would continue current federal spending levels through March 4. That means, incidentally, no increase in RTTT or Investing in Innovation funds.

Snow

And it fell at just the wrong time, so there are problems all over the city. I've heard of at least two school buses that are stuck; the dispatchers know, so they're on it, but it might be awhile.
(And spare a thought for the drivers, particularly if they've still got elementary school kids on there!)

The Sustainability of Level 4's

As of last week, the district received a response* back from the state (DESE) on the Level 4 school Turnaround Plans for Chandler Elementary and Union Hill Schools. Commissioner Chester is "submitting one proposed modification" to the plans. To quote:

1.The Redesign Grant is a competitive process and there is no guarantee that Worcester will be successful in securing Grant funding. To better understand how Worcester is planning to sustain the Turnaround Plan if STG funding is not secured, please describe:

a. The expectation, strategies, and outcomes that the district will hold the school accountable for implementing and attaining if Redesign Grant funds are not secured.

b. The supports and resources that each school can expect to receive from the district if Redesign Grant funds are not secured.

Further, as part of the suggestions for redesign planning, the state asks that the district "identify the features of the plans that will need to be continued beyond the three year grant period to enable sustained improvement and how those features will be funded."

In other words: you may not get this money (amazing how often the state has been saying that of late; that's a bit different than the message we'd gotten a bit earlier that the state was going to work with districts to get them where they needed to be in their applications). What are you going to do then? And further, as has been pointed out from the very beginning (including back when the vote was taken in April), the money goes away in three years; what are you going to do then?

Do we, by state statute, have to do something with Union Hill and Chandler Elementary, regardless of the federal funding? Yes.
Do we have to meet the stringent requirements under the STG application if we don't have the money? Well, no. The four federal choices, the list of what you had to hit under the turnaround plan (including extra learning time), much of that goes by the boards without the funds. And much of that is based on questionable (if exeunt) research, in any case.
My concern here is that the district is being boxed into saying, "yes, we're somehow going to magically come up with the funds for all of these (required by the state) additions" at the same time that we're also trying to figure out how we're going to close an $8.2 million budget gap after a large number of years in which budget gaps have already been closed by cutting services and positions.
Or, if we get the funds, how we're going to continue extra services after the funds go away in three years.
No one doubts that these two schools are needy. In Worcester, though, we have lots of schools that are needy, and I'm cautious taking the state's decision that these were our greatest need schools, and being forced to make it what our budget lives and dies by.

*sorry, no link. The School Committee got a hard copy of the letter and back-up.

No federal consolidated spending bill as yet

The Senate failed to act last night on a consolidated spending bill; there'd been a move afoot to get one through at FY10 levels (for FY11), but that apparently lost support as the week went on. There's a murmurings that the new Congress may try to fund some parts of federal programs at 2008 levels (a move which, for example, would cut $600 million out of special education, which is federally mandated and underfunded already).
If you're interested in what the current funding levels are and where some proposals have gone, the National School Boards Association offers this chart.
Note that nearly every single line on this chart would hit the Worcester Public Schools budget.

All Clear on Coordinated Program Review

As of this past week, the state ed department has said that all corrective action called for under the Coordinated Program Review (the PQA report) has been fully implemented. The corrective actions were recognized as implemented in special ed, civil rights, and English learner education as of October 15; in vocational ed as of December 10.
Note that this is a periodic review; no one is under the impression that this solves everything for all times. And if you have particular issues, do let us know, please.

Tis the Season

Instrumental performance by students at Chandler Magnet Elementary's holiday program

Upcoming budget dates

I didn't take notes on everything in the budget presenation last night (I'll go back and clean up my notes in a bit, maybe post some of the charts), but here's the next part of the timeline:

• the Governor's budget comes out in late January. That starts the conversation at the state level around funding. Pay attention at that point not only to the funding level of ch.70, but also to if there will be redistribution of ch.70, and how they're funding grants,the circuit breaker, and charter reimbursement.
• The House budget comes out in March. With smaller districts to represent, the House are really where the rubber will hit the road on funding that hits particular communities harder than others. Ch. 70 redistribution comes to mind here.
• The City Manager presents the city budget to the City Council in April or May. Two things of import here: where are we in terms of the foundation budget? what sort of hit is the city taking on local aid?
• The Senate budget comes out in May. The Senate tends (as the senators represent larger swathes of territory) to be a bit more big picture. Once that gets voted, and the House has voted theirs, it goes to committee to have the differences resolved.
• Final state budget is due by July 1.

There are as yet no dates for School Committee public hearings or budget presentations, but I'd expect hearings at least sometime in early spring (and it's never too early to let members know your concerns and priorities for the coming year).

Testing and Assessment Specialist

what's up with the position? This from a supplementary agenda, which includes an item sponsored by Mullaney, Foley, and Novick to discuss the position.
(we're having a retirement: how much is this going to cost? what are we looking for?)
Boone: greater requirement that we use data
"what we have to monitor, track, and report on has grown"
can no longer be a one person position
"closing the loop on the data"
"testing requirements, protocols, training..."
PhD is not a requirement for this position; either a master's degree, or significant experience
salary has been restructured.."a specialist position, not a manager's position" (aka, salary will be lower)
Biancheria: are there requirements for licenses? rumor going around that the former person is coming back as a consultant, and a part time person?
Boone says that's news to her
there's no licensure requirement for the existing job, either; none for the new person, either
reports come to superintendent; she then sends them out

TLSS subcommittee report

wellness policy
recess policy
bullying prevention
and recess
Request that the waiver portion of the recess policy be voted separately (from Novick)
(also that the policy be sent to CPPAC, that it be reviewed by parents, teachers, and students prior to spring review, and that site council be included in the budgeting decision for recess expenses)

Monfredo rises to defend the waiver: for "flexibility"
The mayor says that he doesn't find an exception for Gates Lane that compelling (as it abuts a state park)
Biancheria points the subcommittee meetings were standing room only (packed with principals)
Mullaney rises to clarify the objection: it seems like most schools aren't getting kids outside for 30 minutes

Mayor O'Brien reviews the list and counts five schools not able to implement recess and doesn't find it a compelling list
Mullaney says you can't count the time before school as recess
"I don't see what the fuss is about..."

Foley quips that we may find ourselves eliminating recess due to the budget gap
"strong supporter of school-based management"

Mayor says he's concerned by purported academic focus
Boone says that this is the principal voice, as requested; "continuing to work through...some potential solutions...not having recess is not one of these" options

Monfredo rises "importance of recess and academics"...engage in conversation around recess
Novick withdraws motion on exception clause pending a report back to the full committee

Nelson Place rolls on...

It is the only application of the Worcester School Committee for state funds for building renovation or replacement.
Heading next to Council

Mullaney: student enrollment

isn't there a demographic reason? a general flux in the population (there are fewer kids of high school age; there are more kids of elementary age)
Allen agrees that it's a wave of the demographic projection
"people don't always make decisions that aren't always rational decisions"
just because you're paying for it and they're wearing uniforms, there's a thought that it will settle those kids down; it isn't the case
existence of school choice has made it very attractive to go to Wachusett, Auburn, and Shrewsbury (all of which have new high schools)
brings up football teams of surrounding communities and how many of those kids are from Worcester
losing parents whose kids don't make it into the Tech school (through school choice)

Biancheria; questions on the budget

why is transportation going up? It's in the contract, plus we've had to add buses
enrollment doesn't sustain across the grades: lose kids at middle and high schools. She's concerned by this. Boone speaks of keeping those students in the system. (Allen further points out that there are more choices for middle and high; captive audience for elementary)
federal grants are unknown: and come with strings
$8.2 million: 156 jobs is a way of measuring it, it doesn't have to be jobs
"it affects everything that we do every day in our schools"

Novick

question on whether the T&G editorial board reads their own newspaper
money from state and fed comes with rules around how we spend it: we are required to spend money in particular ways
Boston School Committee voted last night to close 18 schools
that will save only $10 million of a $63 million deficit that BPS is projecting
we're now above enrollment level we were at in FY07 when four elementary schools were closed (painful, long term planning)

what effect does a cut in local aid to the city have on the foundation budget?
the state (if it fully funds foundation) has to make up the difference (the part the city can no longer fund)

redistribution of ch.70: some districts have been held harmless (despite drops in enrollment) and/or have had minimum levels of aid increase ($25 per pupil); that's put some communities (largely suburban) over foundation
not surprised to see that redistributed this year (that will keep cities above foundation, but cut suburban districts)

We don't know federal grants (Title 1, IDEA)
We don't know, for certain, cost centers

O'Connell questions the city commitment

"level of commitment from the city"
31% of the budget comes from the city
"very real possibility that the city will fund only the minimum allowed" for education
charges "bear no resemblance at all" to the amount of work borne by the city for grants
Medicaid (I should mention that this was Mr. Monfredo's main point)
"city does not spend significant dollars that it has to spend for the school system"
uses system "as a cash cow" to take money out of the school system and use it for non-educational uses
time to draw the line

need to have a discussion with the Legislature
"more revolving accounts" (to carry funds)
carrying money forward (as Rhode Island is allowed to; Mr. O'Connell's day job is in RI)

Foley on the T&G editorial

Foley points out that the T&G editorial board would fail the MCAS writing portion 
"tracking this very carefully"
"stimulus funds were meant to level of the funding...when the economy fell apart"
"we've been tracking this thing very carefully"
runs through the federal numbers..."to keep our schools from falling apart"
"saving jobs is not bad...means that children in the classroom are receiving instruction"
"insulting comment to make for those of us in the school district"
"targeted nearly $40 million over the next five years"
"the stimulus money that we've had has gone directly into the classroom"

The mayor applauds Mr. Foley's comments.

FY12 budget update

the superintendent turns it over to Brian Allen (You'll find the presentation here.)
review of the FY11 budget
71% of our budget is spent on salaries and health insurance, if you include charter schools; if you exclude charter schools, it's 78%
50% of our budget is for fixed costs; Mr. Allen points out that this 50% rate has been a part of the presentation since 2005 (aka, it shouldn't surprise anyone).
Spending history since 1994: all growth since 2002 has been in charter assessment, tuition assessment, and health insurance (slide 10; worth a look)

2000-07: ch. 70 rose by $700 million, while employee benefit spending rose by over $1 billion
same period: adjusted for inflation per pupil spending fell by 11.3% (you saw this; from the Boston Foundation study)
in spite of a $5 billion increase in education funding 1996-2007, there has been almost no increase in the number of teachers and average class size is no smaller
actual costs of running schools exceeded the foundation budget by 16%
21% below foundation in 1993
came within 3% in 2000
back down to 16% for 2010

Honors

We're starting tonight with honoring the Tech school for their selection by the MetLife Foundation and the National Association of Secondary School Principals as a Breakthrough School. Mr. Coughlin points us to the new website for soliciting funds for the school around this.

Acknowledgement tonight of the donation (first year) of $13,000 in total to Vernon Hill and Quinsigamond Schools from Millbury Savings Bank.

TimothyWilliams, network administrator for WPS, is being deployed overseas with the US Navy, and is, as Superintendent Boone puts it, receiving our version of "manning the rail."

Race to Nowhere: Medford, January 25

Those who have been waiting to see the documentary Race to Nowhere will have a chance in Medford on Tuesday, January 25.
If anyone wants to get a group together, let me know!

Secretary Reville hosts FY12 state budget forum

Massachusetts Secretary of Education Paul Reville will be hosting a forum on the FY12 budget in Worcester next Tuesday:

Tuesday, December 21, 5:30 – 7:30 p.m.

Worcester State University, Blue Room of the Student Center

486 Chandler St., Worcester

There's also one farther east:

Thursday, December 23, 4:00 – 6:00 p.m.

English High School, Auditorium

144 McBride Street, Jamaica Plain

Boston school closures and the charter school connection

I haven't gotten to posting about what's happening to our east, but there's a good summary, along with some weirdness around the charter school connection, over at Blue Mass Group. It looks like Boston is going to have its own version of those painful meetings we saw in New York, where a non-elected board votes on the future of the schools in the community.

A few notes from Teaching, Learning, and Student Supports

I was not there for the whole meeting, as I wanted to see those school buses get through City Council tonight...a few notes from the earlier part of the meeting...
The room was packed, as there were a number of people there to speak to the Gates Foundation item, plus many elementary school principals to speak to the recess item. The recess item was taken first. I should point out that the Academic Office offers this chart as part of the item's backup, which has a response from each building on the implementation of 30 minutes of recess this year.

FY12 preliminary report

The first round of the FY12 budget report is the report of the superintendent for Thursday night's School Committee meeting. The summary is now online (colorful version now up; you can find the full presentation here; you'll also note that there's now an FY12 folder added on the Finance and Operations budget page; scroll down. All links now updated.)
And the answer is $8.2 million.
So far.

The money is where?

Very sorry I couldn't make it to the Worcester Educational Collaborative's budget presentation tonight. Duty called elsewhere. If anyone has notes, I'd be interested!
Before you utterly panic about the future of funding of public education, you may wish to read Bruce Baker.

You know, there are actually legitimate researchers and organizations out there tracking the condition of state and local revenues. And while these have been some tough times, their findings are somewhat less apocolyptic than the comments of Rotherham and Petrilli above… who don’t actually look at state budget data when making these claims. Here are the findings from the most recent quarterly report from the Rockefeller Institute:

a few notes on Finance and Operations

F&O met at noon today. The main reason for the meeting was to get our renewed application into the state for funding for Nelson Place. This went through with some discussion around the crumbling of the structure. It turns out that when the building was built in 1927, we were between technologies; it was built with masonry and steel, and we didn't quite know how to do that well yet. While the building is currently stable, it was built in a way that's going to continue to require ongoing "shoring up"...thus the application to the state to replace the school.
Also on the agenda: administration came back with a response to Mrs. Mullaney's item regarding students accessing their course schedules prior to the start of school.
From the tech side, they can get this ready to go by August 2011. They're working with the academic side.
So here's the thing: the Worcester Public Schools is a big system. 24,000 kids, 3,500 staff, 44 buildings...huge. Getting things changed/done/fixed sometimes seems a lot like turning the Queen Mary. And then sometimes an item gets filed, and admin comes back and says, "Yeah, we can do that, and by the time you need it done."
So to Bob Walton, Brian Allen, and the various tech people working on this system: kudos.

TLSS Standing Committee, including RECESS!

There will be a meeting of the Teaching, Learning, and Student Supports Standing Committee on Tuesday at 5:30 (at the Durkin Administration Building, 4th floor).  You will find the agenda here and (head's up!) it includes RECESS.

Sanders on education

I don't know if you're watching Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont filibuster the tax bill (he's been going four and half hours as I type this); he had this to say on education:

..that we as a people said, no matter what your status is, that we are going to provide you with a great education...that's great. ../does anyone believe that we here in the United States take intellectual development seriously? ..that we reward people who do child care? What are we doing as a nation?
If we are not going to become a third world nation, we have got to start investing..in our educational infrastructure...
Are we nuts? What are we saying to all of these young people?..when you invest in your kids, you invest in the future of America. How are they going to become productive members of society?
If you don't invest in your young people, they are not going to become productive workers...contributing their fair share.

Sputnik. Or not.

I never thought I'd see the day when the Telegram and Gazette was citing Yong Zhao. Nice one, Clive!
Here's Professor Yong Zhao himself on the same test results:

I don’t know why this is such a big surprise to these well educated and smart people. Why should anyone be stunned? It is no news that the Chinese education system is excellent in preparing outstanding test takers, just like other education systems within the Confucian cultural circle—Singapore, Korea, Japan, and Hong Kong.

Also here.
For more on waiting for Sputnik, see here.

How Firm a Foundation

Today's Boston Globe carried a front page article on the Boston Foundation/Mass Business Alliance for Education report on how and if the foundation budget has worked over the past several years, particularly in terms of health insurance. While both the Globe and MBAE have spun this (no big surprise) as a sort of hammer the union piece, the author of the study Edward Moscovitch actually does studies for just about everyone, including the National Education Assocation, and his own opinions are across the board.
The main point of the study--that, while the foundation budget calculates in inflation, health care costs have risen significantly faster than inflation--is entirely true. The foundation budget grew at the inflation rate of 3.4% per year from 2000-2007, while health insurance coverage grew at 13.6% a year. Thus the costs of health coverage have more than eaten up the growth.

Finances comin' up!

Just discovered in the past few days:

• there's a meeting of the Finance and Operations subcommittee Monday, December 13 at noon at DAB. This is that meeting to get through a request to the Massachusetts School Buildings Authority so it can be passed by the full committee, go to the City Council, and get passed there, all before the end of January. (Thus the awkward time: it's being jammed into an already scheduled week.)
• The report of the superintendent at next week's meeting with be the first presentation on the budget for FY12. If you've got any interest--and this is going to be a tough year, as you've probably heard--come or watch.

University Park Campus School visit

I had a great visit today to University Park Campus School. It's in the former Freeland Street School (built, as it says over the door, in 1885), right across the street from the Goddard School, which makes no sense until you discover that Goddard used to be South High (chalk that up as something I learned today; thanks, Mr.Navin!). Now, of course, UPCS serves grades 7-12 selected by neighborhood lottery, while Goddard is the large elementary school across the street.
I have to admit that I'm a sucker for historic buildings, but that wasn't the big thing that I took away from UPCS.

You won't find this in the Boston Globe

In fact, I can't find any evidence that any press has covered it in Massachusetts.
Of the much-mentioned 276 districts that originally signed on for Race to the Top in Massachusetts, 19 districts (or LEAs...I can't find a list, so I don't know if some are charter schools) have dropped out of the program.

On the one hand, among the school systems that asked out of the state’s plan, concerns about the costs of implementing it were the “dominant calculus,” said Mitchell D. Chester, the state’s commissioner of education. Many of those participants, he noted, were slated to receive small amounts of federal money—in some cases $20,000 or $80,000—and some would have received nothing.

This is very much in keeping with a meeting I was at with urban superintendents, in which several--including Worcester's Superintendent Boone--pushed the Commissioner on the lack of administrative support from the state for a very complicated, multiple part program; this is true not only in Massachusetts, but around the country, including Ohio, which has seen 1 out of every 11 district participating drop out. Very little money can be used on administration (I believe it's the usual grant 2%) at a time when administration is already stretched thin on the ground, especially in smaller districts, already. Contrary to Forest Hinton's faux disbelief that this might be about what works, what doesn't, and how much money is involved, it very much is.
Oh, and principles. Here's to Superintendent William C. Matthews for deciding it wasn't enough money to buy out his.

Speaking of dysfunctional...

And if you'd like to feel good about how well your school committee gets along with your council/board, read this.

Nutrition bill passes Congress, off to White House

Congress voted yesterday to approve a new federal child nutrition bill. Among other important things (see a good list here) is it increases the reimbursement of each free lunch by six cents. This is the first increase since 1973.
Speaking as someone who was born in 1973, I'd say that's a bit overdue.

Four things you may not know about the Worcester School Committee

• We don't get invited to everything. Before I was elected, I assumed that there was a magical list that the Committee members all got of things going on that were education-related that week. There's no such thing. We all read the paper, the website, whatever school newsletters are sent to us, and such, but if you wonder why School Committee members didn't come to something, there's a good chance that we simply didn't know about it. (And if you're in a PTO or something similar and want to let us know, we all have mailboxes at the administration building at 20 Irving Street, so you can send things there, even through pony mail. Which doesn't have ponies. But you probably knew that.)
• Just because it wasn't discussed on the floor doesn't mean nothing happened. First of all, in some cases, filing an item on an agenda is sometimes seen as making a statement (it isn't, always, but it can be). Sometimes it's easier and you have more of a chance of actually getting something done by just sending an email or making a phone call. Also, there are restrictions around what can be discussed in open meeting: personnel items that are subject to the superintendent, for example, cannot be discussed on the floor.
• Those chairs are really uncomfortable. Yes, even more uncomfortable than those in the gallery. It's popularly held though that a) the mayor's chair is the most uncomfortable, and b) it's intentional, so the meetings don't run long. You can judge best if that works.
• We appreciate public comment. And no, I'm not just saying that. The City Council not uncommonly gets overwhelmed with comments on issues; not so the School Committee. But we're in charge of your kids for seven hours a day; you should by all means let us know how you feel about things that affect them, as should the kids themselves.

Online checkbook

The mayor's asked for the district's checkbook to be put online; it already is, because the district does not have a separate checkbook. All Worcester Public Schools checks are written by the City of Worcester.

MSBA list

The Massachusetts School Building Authority has reviewed all our schools and has a priority list; we're getting it back in January.
At the same time, the MSBA is letting us know that our requests are due January 26 (and they have to go through School Committee and through City Council before being sent to the state), so we're not going to have their list before we send in our request. Brian Allen comes forward to note the irony ('though he doesn't call it that) here.
Both off to Finance and Operations, but the latter will be creating a special meeting so we can get it back for December 16.
And here's guessing Nelson Place.

Worcester Technical High School: "a Breakthrough School"

Worcester Technical High School was selected as a Breakthrough School by MetLife and the National Association of Secondary School Principals.

Report on transfers

Biancheria: 150 students that have been mobile...would like some information on the mobility of our students
"I'm not sure if we have all the information about why they're moving so much..."
..what we can do to help some of the students who have moved three times in one year
"Do I have an answer for this? No. Am I concerned with it? Yes."
Boone: "mobility is a risk factor for school failure"
Biancheria asks for a similar report for quarter, "for a full picture"
Boone suggests that we send it to accountability

University Park Campus isn't here...Novick asks why not...and...no one knows.

O'Connell asks about the Tech student who moved for curriculuar reasons. We're guessing Horticulture (which was dropped this past year).

Mercury

Biancheria: thanks for holding...a learning lesson for anyone...can't afford to point any fingers..knows administration will work...school committee members open to questions from public
asks that the item be filed

Goal setting

Core values and operating principals..and goals separated to be approved
"less is sometimes more..no more than five goals (recommended by MASC)"

Len Zaluskas

on Level 4 schools:
(note, by the way, that this is pending litigation...)
"one of their key recommendations was an extended day take place at these schools...we bargained over extending the day at both schools...Joint Resolution Committee..I'm disappointed that there was a decision rendered and this body has chosen not to honor that, as of now...have you asked the city of Worcester..or the state...could you come up with the money for it? Understanding it's not free...if 90 minutes are too expensive, why not extended the day by 60 minutes, which by my math, could be done?...the kids deserve it, the city deserves it...I think that we can come to some sort of a resolution, but we could put our minds together..invitation to bargain is much different than just meeting...did you ask the City Manager for extra funds..did you contact the state...the 60 minutes..it seems you could afford it."

Clarification on who goes to Tech

Students whose families have MOVED can continue through Worcester Tech...but kids from outside of town beyond that are NOT in Worcester Tech.
Out of town kids aren't taken until we've taken all the kids off the waiting list (which, the mayor comments, would take 20 years).
Monfredo: "a waiting list of over 800 students...there are students that have moved that are allowed to continue their education at Worcester Tech"
the superintendent comments further that having the technical school be part of the city system allows that; it isn't a regional system
Foley: query on checking addresses for accuracy
David Joyce: everyone he knows lives in the city, or did when they were admitted

Report from TLSS: Field trips

reporting out from Teaching, Learning, and Student Supports :

• review of curriculum for alignment with Common Core
• anti-bullying
• ad-hoc committee on mathematics to be developed
• draft foreign and domestic travel policy to be developed by administration, allowing it but minimizing school liability

The committee thus asks, as per usual, for the report (and motions) to be approved.
The mayor clarifies that we are not approving a policy tonight: we are approving the drafting of a policy. (He further notes that Assistant City Solicitor O'Day, who has served the WPS, has retired, and we haven't get gotten ourselves lined up with the Solicitor's office)

More demystifying

You might remember that the Mass Budget and Policy Center put out a piece a bit ago, explaining the Ch. 70 formula. It's now a video, and guess what city is one of the comparisons?

Using technology in education wisely

A solid post by Scott McLeod on what we'd do if we were serious about edtech:

• Show students how to edit their privacy settings and use groups in Facebook instead of banning online social networks because they're "dangerous" and/or "frivolous";
• Teach students to understand and contribute to the online information commons rather than just saying no to Wikipedia;
• Put a robust digital learning device into every student's hands (or let them bring and use their own) instead of pretending that we live in a pencil, notebook paper, and ring binder world;
• Integrate digital learning and teaching tools into subject-specific pre-service methods courses rather than marginalizing instructional technology as a separate course;
• Understand the true risk of students encountering online predators and make policy accordingly instead of succumbing to scare tactics by the media, politicians, law enforcement, computer security vendors, and others;
• Find out the exact percentage of our schools' families that don't have broadband Internet access at home rather than treating the amorphous 'digital divide' as a reason not to assign any homework that involves use of the Internet;

(and etc)...leads to a post on the real risk of online behavior by Lee Kolbert.

Ravitch at Clark

Ravitch was introduced by Professor Tom DelPrete to a crowd of 300 people or more (they kept bringing out chairs!). In the crowd, among many others, I saw four School Committee members(myself, Mullaney, Monfredo, and Foley), one City Councilor (Lukes), Research Bureau staff, and two senior WPS administrators (Mulqueen and Perda).
DelPrete: "tremendous interest in education in Worcester...get it right for the wonderfully diverse children..stimulate and inform our thinking...our actions"

"foremost critic of prevailing education policy"
"unflinching in staking her ground"
"to confront the prevailing remedies"
citing Bridging Differences (with Deb Meier)

Upcoming events

First of all, you are planning on seeing Diane Ravitch this afternoon, right? 4 pm, Tilton Hall, Higgins University Center at Clark (that's the building on the left of Red Square; it's on the second floor)
If you're wondering what's up with innovation schools in Worcester, you will want to come down to the library next Wednesday evening, December 8, at 5 pm for a community briefing on innovation schools.
And you know the budget's coming! There's briefing on the budget on December 13 at the Mass College of Pharmacy at 5:30 pm on the Worcester Public Schools budget. (sorry, WEC doesn't have a link up for that one)

School Committee meeting Thursday

The Worcester School Committee meets on Thursday. You'll find the agenda here. Up this week:

• goal setting! This time, we narrow them down to a managable number.
•  a TLSS subcommittee report. Look for much talk of a) the Common Core and b) foreign field trips. I wasn't at this meeting and I haven't seen the backup on this yet, so I don't know what recommendations are coming out of the subcommittee. Look for the foreign field trips part to be lively!
• mercury, mercury, mercury
• a few recognitions and donations (mostly setting dates and accepting money)
• looking at the priorities set by the state on our building replacements
• a few items around student referrals and special education

There is an executive session preceding, as per usual. I haven't seen an agenda for that, but don't be surprised if the meeting starts a bit after 7 pm. And so long as the wifi is up, I'll be blogging.