San Francisco Unified signed a contract with OpenAI before putting it before their school board, where it appears on their consent agenda.
As the San Francisco Public Press notes in their coverage:
Even if students do not have direct access, data such as school work, academic records, behavioral information and digital interactions can be especially sensitive, since minors have special legal protections. Once shared with vendors, student information can be stored, analyzed or reused beyond public view.
Artificial intelligence chatbots can present privacy problems for schools, said Lee Tien, legislative director at the San Francisco-based Electronic Frontier Foundation, which scrutinizes how many public institutions, including schools, use technology and collect private data.
The timing and handling of the agreement raised questions about how San Francisco school administrators evaluate and approve technology tools, and whether meaningful oversight occurs, Tien said. When procurement decisions come in advance of review by accountable leadership, public discussions about surveillance and transparency can be shortchanged. “It’s simply rubber-stamping decisions that were being made, and you don’t know why they were being made,” Tien said.
Such a procurement decision, unless it exceeded five years, wouldn't even need to come to the school committee in Massachusetts at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note that comments on this blog are moderated.