Thursday, May 6, 2010

WEMS meeting vote

So it looks like we've got Biancheria, Novick, possibly O'Connell and Monfredo pro

Foley, Mullaney, possibly O'Brien con



O'Connell and Monfredo speaking of this as a marketing possibility



Boone: concern that there's an implicit concern that they would not be true to their word on meeting

hope that the process would be used to highlight positive



O'Connell recommends referring to the administration

Biancheria asks if that will supercede the date set

O'Brien offers an amendment that the adminstration come back with dates and an agenda

Biancheria requests a seldom precedented recess
---two minute recess---
Monfredo offers an amendment, then a separate motion for the June 2 date, then he withdraws it, as Boone would prefer it be left to administration

That motion passes unanimously
The original item is held for a week

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note that comments on this blog are moderated.